Shine On…you crazy optimistic science fiction writer
Anyone having read some of my previous posts will have noticed I haven’t quite mastered the writing fiction to a deadline yet. Although I am not completely shambolic and unreliable as I have managed to edit/revise and review to deadline recently. So, perhaps all hope for me is not quite lost.
Since I started this science fiction writing adventure last year there have been a couple of submission calls that have caught my attention. My biggest hurdle is being able to come up with an idea and commit to it based on the submission guidelines. I first encountered this a few years ago when writing some fanfiction online. There are often writing challenges in the communities. You would think since the characters and the universe is pretty much already set, all you have to do is take the theme and run with it.
For some this is not a problem, for me it always seems to be. I would start out trying to write to the theme but inevitably it would go in a different direction and I could never adequately (to my own standard) complete these stories.
I think I scared myself off such challenges. After all it really is a challenge. Writing to a theme that is not your own, to a guideline that is not your own. Somehow conforming (even just a little bit) to someone elses will, I think, is really hard for a writer to do. At least it is for me.
So, why am I talking about this? Well, as someone who has become committed to their writing with a goal toward making it a career, it’s not enough for me to simply sit by myself and write my stories or my novel. I need to challenge myself, I need to expand my horizons, so to speak, in a literary way. If I act stagnant my writing will only be stagnant. That is the theory anyway.
For a while I’ve been sitting on the fence about an anthology that has an open submission call going on called “Shine” edited by Jetse de Vries. The theme is actually quite simple in someways but quite difficult in others. The call is for “Optimistic Near Future Science Fiction” something which has caused some debate on his own web-site and others.
For myself, I fell into the pattern of believing that I didn’t want to write “Optimitic sci-fi” and that I wasn’t capable of it. I wouldn’t say I am a master of the dystopia though. Although I dearly love it’s use in some science fiction it has become extremely cliched in many ways and it’s not something I’ve ever really written. That doesn’t mean though that my futures are full of happiness and light but I do believe in the happy ending. Not always, but sometimes after struggle it is necessary and justified.
With that in mind I’ve been thinking about this anthology more and more and recently Jetse posted a link “Why I can’t Write Optimistic Sci-Fi – The Excuses” and after reading and working through each of the many excuses and counter arguments most writers (I make an assumption) should be left feeling embarrassed, ashamed and perhaps a little more enthusiastic that they can actually take on this challenge. At the very least you are left feeling that you really should challenge yourself in this way, the attempt is what is important.
I felt very inspired and trolling through the vast catalogue of half ideas gathering dust in my brain pulled out the beginnings of an idea which may (or may not that is up to Jetse to decide) fulfill the theme and guidelines and perhaps contribute a little light into the darkness of the universe.
The biggest obstacle now is the time constraint. The original open call deadline was 1st of July, which for someone like me who writes at a snail’s pace is extremely quick and with no time to workshop the story in between. I am still feeling that, as an unpublished author, I need the feedback of others to help push me along and pick my way to confidence in my ability.
Luckily, Jetse has kindly extended the deadline a further month and although it feels like a reprieve, again, for me it’s quite quick but I may, at least get an opportunity to workshop it before submitting.
What I will have to do now is just “crack on”.
When I honestly think about it, my own work isn’t as horribly pessimistic as I would like to believe. As I said before, I am a believer in triumph over adversity. The challenge isn’t so much about the optimism but the writing to deadline and still managing to please myself (although I am beginning to believe that is nearly impossible) and the sticking with the theme constraints that Jetse has laid out.
So, here we go.

Yay! Good luck with finishing it.
I like taking on the challenge of writing to a theme. I find it stimulates ideas for really good stories that I might not have had before. I’m thinking in particular, Electric Velocipede’s call for stories that featured words used in the US Spelling Bee finals (which eventually became “Logorrhea”) and Vandermeer and Roberts’s “Thackery T Lambshead’s Pocket Guide To Eccentric And Discredited Diseases” which was amazing fun.
Sometimes it works and you synergise quickly with what the editor has in mind. And sometimes it doesn’t. I was totally into the idea of doing a pirate story, and immediately knew exactly what I was going to do. But the story took way to long to finish. Same problem with a couple of other open anthologies recently, including “Shine” (although the extended deadline will help me now too).
As to “Shine” itself, I’ve found it a real challenge. I was also one of those who on hearing the concept retreated instinctively. Not because I’m a devotee of dystopias particularly (although I do have a tendency towards melancholy), more because I have never been fond of either dystopias or utopias, because, well, life’s more complicated than that. But my take on what (I hope) Jetse’s looking for is not so much “humanity working towards utopia”, than it’s possible to make improvements in some sphere of life, improving the lot of some, although by no means everyone. So, the world stays complicated, with many still suffering the same problems they had before but in some way we’ve moved a step towards a better society. And there’s plenty scope to play with there.
Like a lot of things (and particularly recently) people hear a certain word like “optimism” and make assumptions without delving into the meat of the matter. Certainly I was quilty of this with “Shine”, but I agree, my interrpretation after reading the site full is that it is about making a change for the better and not either working in or creating a utopia merely solving a real problem with an “optimistic” solution. I do like Jetse’s ponderance over “Dystopia-lite” and why people would submit such stories to an Anthology that calls for optimism.
Hopefully we shall both meet the deadline, and also taking a hint from his list of submission mine shall not take place in America. But perhaps get some revenge on the British
>perhaps get some revenge on the British
By making our lives better? Go for it!
Why do you always thwart me?
Because…I’m…your…nemesis?
Actually, you are one of the coolest people I know and everyone should read your books and give you money.
Go for it! My story has already been rejected (apparantly it was a “Dystopia in disguise”), so there’s less competition
Must admit the story I submitted wasn’t written specifically for Shine, but I thought it might just bend it’s way into the requirements. Ah well…
I’m sure Jetse won’t mind me copying a general comment from his rejection which might throw some light on what he wants: “Basically, I’m not looking for Utopias (even if the Utopia is not quite what it seems to be, as the story is about to reveal), but for stories that try to solve (at least one of) the problems that are plaguing us today, like (but not limited to) overpopulation, environmental degradation, war, greed, pollution, climate change and more.”
Hope that helps!
Thanks Andy, sorry to hear you would be rejected…I was having a fantasy that if I did make it in to the Anthology many of my “writing” buddies would be there too and my first published story would be nestled in comfort amongst some really great fellows.
I do keep going back to the site and re-reading some of the instructions/guidelines/conversations as I do find my story keeps straying from the point. LOL so perhaps it is harder to right Optimistic science fiction even when it is your intention.